Gentoo Archives: gentoo-dev

From: Danny van Dyk <kugelfang@g.o>
To: gentoo-dev@l.g.o
Cc: Ciaran McCreesh <ciaranm@×××××××.org>
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] [ANN] Multiple version suffixes illegal in gentoo-x86
Date: Wed, 25 Apr 2007 08:08:30
Message-Id: 200704250957.39745.kugelfang@gentoo.org
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-dev] [ANN] Multiple version suffixes illegal in gentoo-x86 by Ciaran McCreesh
1 Am Mittwoch, 25. April 2007 schrieb Ciaran McCreesh:
2 > On Tue, 24 Apr 2007 12:31:48 -0700
3 >
4 > "Robin H. Johnson" <robbat2@g.o> wrote:
5 > > printf "_rc%d%04d%02d%02d",$RC,$YEAR,$MONTH,$DAY
6 >
7 > Funnily enough... If we're going by PMS drafts, that's illegal
8 > whereas multiple suffixes are legal. PMS permits multiple suffixes,
9 > but limits any individual version component to eight digits to avoid
10 > problems with integer overflows, floating point precision etc.
11
12 And when PMS specifies that together with a proper way to compare
13 multiple suffixes there will be no problem.
14
15 This Council decission was to avoid 'existing practice' that might be
16 necessary to include in PMS.
17
18 Danny
19 --
20 Danny van Dyk <kugelfang@g.o>
21 Gentoo/AMD64 Project, Gentoo Scientific Project
22 --
23 gentoo-dev@g.o mailing list

Replies

Subject Author
Re: [gentoo-dev] [ANN] Multiple version suffixes illegal in gentoo-x86 Ciaran McCreesh <ciaranm@×××××××.org>