| 1 |
On Fri, 28 Feb 2014 15:28:30 +0200 Samuli Suominen wrote: |
| 2 |
|
| 3 |
>It would be very helpful if INSTALL_MASK could be overriden from an |
| 4 |
>ebuild, if user hasn't |
| 5 |
>set otherwise. |
| 6 |
>So it could be configured like USE_ORDER which is |
| 7 |
>"env:pkg:conf:defaults:pkginternal:repo:env.d" |
| 8 |
>So INSTALL_MASK_ORDER like "ebuild:${user's own INSTALL_MASK}" |
| 9 |
>This would be very helpful in preventing people from shooting themself |
| 10 |
>in the foot |
| 11 |
> |
| 12 |
>The only problem is that I propably don't have enough python skills to |
| 13 |
>make that happen w/ |
| 14 |
>sys-apps/portage. But does the suggestion make sense? Should I open a |
| 15 |
>feature request bug? |
| 16 |
> |
| 17 |
|
| 18 |
No need for if the ebuild(s) would use sane installation paths. |
| 19 |
|
| 20 |
Please finally stop imposing your insane ideas upon us, thanks. |
| 21 |
|
| 22 |
-- |
| 23 |
Lars Wendler |
| 24 |
Gentoo package maintainer |
| 25 |
GPG: 4DD8 C47C CDFA 5295 E1A6 3FC8 F696 74AB 981C A6FC |
Archives