1 |
On 28/02/14 16:41, Lars Wendler wrote: |
2 |
> On Fri, 28 Feb 2014 15:28:30 +0200 Samuli Suominen wrote: |
3 |
> |
4 |
>> It would be very helpful if INSTALL_MASK could be overriden from an |
5 |
>> ebuild, if user hasn't |
6 |
>> set otherwise. |
7 |
>> So it could be configured like USE_ORDER which is |
8 |
>> "env:pkg:conf:defaults:pkginternal:repo:env.d" |
9 |
>> So INSTALL_MASK_ORDER like "ebuild:${user's own INSTALL_MASK}" |
10 |
>> This would be very helpful in preventing people from shooting themself |
11 |
>> in the foot |
12 |
>> |
13 |
>> The only problem is that I propably don't have enough python skills to |
14 |
>> make that happen w/ |
15 |
>> sys-apps/portage. But does the suggestion make sense? Should I open a |
16 |
>> feature request bug? |
17 |
>> |
18 |
> No need for if the ebuild(s) would use sane installation paths. |
19 |
> |
20 |
> Please finally stop imposing your insane ideas upon us, thanks. |
21 |
> |
22 |
|
23 |
You should stop attacking people. Period. |