1 |
On Fri, 28 Feb 2014 16:41:23 +0200 Samuli Suominen wrote: |
2 |
|
3 |
> |
4 |
>On 28/02/14 16:41, Lars Wendler wrote: |
5 |
>> On Fri, 28 Feb 2014 15:28:30 +0200 Samuli Suominen wrote: |
6 |
>> |
7 |
>>> It would be very helpful if INSTALL_MASK could be overriden from an |
8 |
>>> ebuild, if user hasn't |
9 |
>>> set otherwise. |
10 |
>>> So it could be configured like USE_ORDER which is |
11 |
>>> "env:pkg:conf:defaults:pkginternal:repo:env.d" |
12 |
>>> So INSTALL_MASK_ORDER like "ebuild:${user's own INSTALL_MASK}" |
13 |
>>> This would be very helpful in preventing people from shooting |
14 |
>>> themself in the foot |
15 |
>>> |
16 |
>>> The only problem is that I propably don't have enough python skills |
17 |
>>> to make that happen w/ |
18 |
>>> sys-apps/portage. But does the suggestion make sense? Should I open |
19 |
>>> a feature request bug? |
20 |
>>> |
21 |
>> No need for if the ebuild(s) would use sane installation paths. |
22 |
>> |
23 |
>> Please finally stop imposing your insane ideas upon us, thanks. |
24 |
>> |
25 |
> |
26 |
>You should stop attacking people. Period. |
27 |
|
28 |
Once you stop trying to make things worse in Gentoo I will consider |
29 |
stopping my attacks... so it's up to you. |
30 |
|
31 |
-- |
32 |
Lars Wendler |
33 |
Gentoo package maintainer |
34 |
GPG: 4DD8 C47C CDFA 5295 E1A6 3FC8 F696 74AB 981C A6FC |