| 1 |
On 28/02/14 19:01, Lars Wendler wrote: |
| 2 |
> On Fri, 28 Feb 2014 16:41:23 +0200 Samuli Suominen wrote: |
| 3 |
> |
| 4 |
>> On 28/02/14 16:41, Lars Wendler wrote: |
| 5 |
>>> On Fri, 28 Feb 2014 15:28:30 +0200 Samuli Suominen wrote: |
| 6 |
>>> |
| 7 |
>>>> It would be very helpful if INSTALL_MASK could be overriden from an |
| 8 |
>>>> ebuild, if user hasn't |
| 9 |
>>>> set otherwise. |
| 10 |
>>>> So it could be configured like USE_ORDER which is |
| 11 |
>>>> "env:pkg:conf:defaults:pkginternal:repo:env.d" |
| 12 |
>>>> So INSTALL_MASK_ORDER like "ebuild:${user's own INSTALL_MASK}" |
| 13 |
>>>> This would be very helpful in preventing people from shooting |
| 14 |
>>>> themself in the foot |
| 15 |
>>>> |
| 16 |
>>>> The only problem is that I propably don't have enough python skills |
| 17 |
>>>> to make that happen w/ |
| 18 |
>>>> sys-apps/portage. But does the suggestion make sense? Should I open |
| 19 |
>>>> a feature request bug? |
| 20 |
>>>> |
| 21 |
>>> No need for if the ebuild(s) would use sane installation paths. |
| 22 |
>>> |
| 23 |
>>> Please finally stop imposing your insane ideas upon us, thanks. |
| 24 |
>>> |
| 25 |
>> You should stop attacking people. Period. |
| 26 |
> Once you stop trying to make things worse in Gentoo I will consider |
| 27 |
> stopping my attacks... so it's up to you. |
| 28 |
> |
| 29 |
|
| 30 |
Is there anything you'd like to add before I open the comrel bug about |
| 31 |
baseless accusation of making things intentionally worse? |
| 32 |
|
| 33 |
- Samuli |
Archives