Gentoo Archives: gentoo-dev

From: Jakub Moc <jakub@g.o>
To: gentoo-dev@l.g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: A heretical thought? Blessing project sunrise as an almost-fork.
Date: Wed, 14 Jun 2006 20:40:11
Message-Id: 449072EF.40405@gentoo.org
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: A heretical thought? Blessing project sunrise as an almost-fork. by Stephen Bennett
1 Stephen Bennett wrote:
2 > On Wed, 14 Jun 2006 20:21:42 +0200
3 > Jakub Moc <jakub@g.o> wrote:
4 >
5 >> Sure... so, perhaps you have some suggestion how I can read assign
6 >> bugs otherwise than using the metadata.xml; perhaps I could learn to
7 >> read minds of the developers who dump irrelevant stuff into
8 >> metadata.xml and expect someone to know what they meant.
9 >
10 > It's not irrelevant; you're just not reading it properly. You might
11 > notice that metadata.xml contains tags other than <herd>, like, say,
12 > <maintainer>. In the example that sparked this, <herd> is games and
13 > <maintainer> the individual dev who maintains it. Simple enough, no?
14
15 Please, go through the tree and see at least so many metadata.xml files
16 as I have seen, before claiming something that simply doesn't reflect
17 current practice. There are many ebuilds with no <maintainer> tag and
18 <herd> only. Are you claiming that they are unmaintained? Well, that
19 obviously doesn't match the reality. So, if they actually _are_
20 maintained by the relevant herd, then you shouldn't dump stuff on that
21 herd without discussing it w/ them first. I'm pretty sure mcummings will
22 gladly explain to you what will happen if you do, as well as a bunch of
23 other devs... :P
24
25 To make it pretty clear and explicit - bugs gets assigned to
26 <maintainer> (if there's any in metadata.xml), and get CCed to <herd>
27 (if there's any in metadata.xml). If there's no <maintainer>, whoever is
28 in <herd> will get that bug assigned and can happily smack you butt once
29 they've find out you've dumped the package on them without their
30 knowledge... That's how the large part of current ~600 dev-perl/*
31 ebuilds has made it into the tree and that mistake doesn't need to be
32 repeated.
33
34
35
36 --
37 Best regards,
38
39 Jakub Moc
40 mailto:jakub@g.o
41 GPG signature:
42 http://subkeys.pgp.net:11371/pks/lookup?op=get&search=0xCEBA3D9E
43 Primary key fingerprint: D2D7 933C 9BA1 C95B 2C95 B30F 8717 D5FD CEBA 3D9E
44
45 ... still no signature ;)

Attachments

File name MIME type
signature.asc application/pgp-signature

Replies