Gentoo Archives: gentoo-dev

From: Ciaran McCreesh <ciaranm@g.o>
To: gentoo-dev@l.g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: Unmasking modular X
Date: Wed, 01 Feb 2006 10:21:30
Message-Id: 20060201101849.6c568858@snowdrop.home
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: Unmasking modular X by Donnie Berkholz
1 On Wed, 01 Feb 2006 00:25:25 -0800 Donnie Berkholz
2 <spyderous@g.o> wrote:
3 | Mark Loeser wrote:
4 | > I don't really see why anyone that is marking an ebuild stable
5 | > needs to have a fatal error because an older version of that
6 | > package isn't ported yet. We are perfectly capable of mentioning
7 | > this on the bug so the maintainer can fix it later :) A flag to
8 | > ignore it will make me, and probably other archs, happy though.
9 |
10 | I see broken dependencies with modular X
11
12 They're not broken. They're sub-optimal.
13
14 --
15 Ciaran McCreesh : Gentoo Developer (King of all Londinium)
16 Mail : ciaranm at gentoo.org
17 Web : http://dev.gentoo.org/~ciaranm

Attachments

File name MIME type
signature.asc application/pgp-signature