1 |
Hi all, |
2 |
|
3 |
I wanted to create some ebuilds for at least one community server (represented |
4 |
by a bunch of ebuilds); |
5 |
|
6 |
So, I was looking for the right category for all of those ebuilds that belong |
7 |
to this software, however, I didn't find a proper category for each of them |
8 |
at all :( |
9 |
|
10 |
The software I am talking about is called YaCS (yet another community system) |
11 |
and consists of the following parts (that are being split up into seperate |
12 |
ebuilds): |
13 |
|
14 |
dev-libs/libyacsutil |
15 |
- the support library (client/server) |
16 |
community-libs/libyacs |
17 |
- the YaCS core framework library (server) |
18 |
community-server/yacsd |
19 |
- the UNIX daemon process finally serving the community |
20 |
app-admin/yacsadmin |
21 |
- the server console administration tool |
22 |
app-benchmarks/yb |
23 |
- a server benchmarking tool (think of / like: ab, the apache benchmark) |
24 |
www-apache/mod_yacs |
25 |
- the apache module that serves as the front-end for the end-users |
26 |
community-server/yacs-meta |
27 |
- the meta package for YaCS, in case everything has to be |
28 |
run on a single server |
29 |
|
30 |
Now, you see, I already proposed my (in my mind) ideal categories. |
31 |
The problem are two packages I couldnn't fit into currently existing |
32 |
categories. |
33 |
In fact, we even haven't any community server in portage yet (and there do |
34 |
exist quite a few). |
35 |
So, I might have a little (continuous) brain-dead and though, would like to be |
36 |
pointed to the right category for those two packages; otherwise, I'd like to |
37 |
propose those two new categories - in that case: who's the karma to initiate |
38 |
them? |
39 |
|
40 |
Other community software I found (*and* are free): |
41 |
* boo - http://yallara.cs.rmit.edu.au/~malsmith/products/boo/ |
42 |
* yChat - http://www.ychat.org/ |
43 |
* SPiN Chat System - http://chat.spin.de/en/ (dunno what kinda license it is) |
44 |
|
45 |
note: while browsing google, I found lots of commercial software of this |
46 |
subject and just a few few (serious) open sourced ones. |
47 |
|
48 |
So, finally, in what category could those packages be placed in? |
49 |
|
50 |
Thanks in advance, |
51 |
Christian Parpart. |
52 |
|
53 |
-- |
54 |
23:17:49 up 119 days, 12:25, 0 users, load average: 4.17, 2.57, 3.12 |