1 |
On Fri, 21 Jun 2019 09:18:23 +0200 David Seifert wrote: |
2 |
> On Fri, 2019-06-21 at 08:59 +0300, Andrew Savchenko wrote: |
3 |
> > On Thu, 20 Jun 2019 16:32:56 +0200 Michał Górny wrote: |
4 |
> > > On Thu, 2019-06-20 at 09:53 -0400, Brian Evans wrote: |
5 |
> > > > On 6/9/2019 7:39 AM, Michał Górny wrote: |
6 |
> > > > > +Tracking of user/group usage is done through dependencies. As |
7 |
> > > > > long |
8 |
> > > > > +as any installed package depends on a specific user/group |
9 |
> > > > > package, |
10 |
> > > > > +the respective user/group is assumed to be used. If no |
11 |
> > > > > package |
12 |
> > > > > +requiring the specific user/group is left, the package manager |
13 |
> > > > > +automatically prunes the package clearly indicating it is no |
14 |
> > > > > longer |
15 |
> > > > > +used. |
16 |
> > > > |
17 |
> > > > You cannot know when a name is "no longer used". An |
18 |
> > > > administrator could |
19 |
> > > > have adopted a username for other purposes. |
20 |
> > > |
21 |
> > > That's why we don't remove the actual user/group. However, this is |
22 |
> > > a valuable information to the administrator that no package is |
23 |
> > > using |
24 |
> > > the user/group in question. |
25 |
> > |
26 |
> > So how do you propose to clean them up? Or let user systems trash |
27 |
> > with unused uids/gids? The GLEP 81 only mensions some possible |
28 |
> > tooling for cleanup. Is there an implementation available? I don't |
29 |
> > see it within proposed patch sets. |
30 |
> > |
31 |
> > This GLEP should not be accepted unless all necessary tools are |
32 |
> > available including a cleanup tool. |
33 |
> > |
34 |
> > Best regards, |
35 |
> > Andrew Savchenko |
36 |
> |
37 |
> Strongly disagree: |
38 |
> |
39 |
> 1) User systems are already getting trashed. And apparently it's not a |
40 |
> critical thing that prevents users from using Gentoo in practice. |
41 |
> 2) A cleanup tool at best will only tell you which files you need to |
42 |
> check, randomly deleting files with orphaned uids/gids is not a good |
43 |
> idea. |
44 |
|
45 |
What will happen when some acct-*/* package will be unmerged? Will |
46 |
uid/gid record and/or its files be deteleted? |
47 |
|
48 |
> 3) This proposal strictly increases the quality of Gentoo. Don't let |
49 |
> perfect be the enemy of the good. The fact that the problem isn't |
50 |
> solved to 100% doesn't mean that a solution that gets us there 85% |
51 |
> should be rejected. |
52 |
> |
53 |
> Strongly vote +1 to merge this now. |
54 |
> |
55 |
> |
56 |
|
57 |
|
58 |
Best regards, |
59 |
Andrew Savchenko |