| 1 |
Sent from my Verizon Wireless BlackBerry
|
| 2 |
|
| 3 |
-----Original Message-----
|
| 4 |
From: Ben Kohler <bkohler@×××××.com>
|
| 5 |
Date: Wed, 17 Feb 2016 08:01:32
|
| 6 |
To: <gentoo-dev@l.g.o>
|
| 7 |
Reply-to: gentoo-dev@l.g.o
|
| 8 |
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Changing order of default virtual/udev provider
|
| 9 |
|
| 10 |
On Wed, Feb 17, 2016 at 7:55 AM, Richard Yao <ryao@g.o> wrote:
|
| 11 |
|
| 12 |
> |
| 13 |
> |
| 14 |
> eudev has every commit scrutinized by people who care about using it on |
| 15 |
> Gentoo. systemd-udev does not. Consequently, eudev has avoided the system |
| 16 |
> boot breaking regressions that prompted its creation. That is a good reason |
| 17 |
> to make it the new default. If it fails to fulfill its duties, then this |
| 18 |
> could be revisited, but that should be unlikely. |
| 19 |
> |
| 20 |
> I think if someone could enumerate those specific breakages and present it |
| 21 |
as evidence, that could get more people on board for this change. Moreso
|
| 22 |
than just "upstream doesn't care about us" or "eventually split udev will
|
| 23 |
be impossible".
|
| 24 |
|
| 25 |
-Ben |
Archives