Gentoo Archives: gentoo-dev

From: "Marijn Schouten (hkBst)" <hkBst@g.o>
To: gentoo-dev@l.g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] guidline to set a timeline of removal of ebuild from stable tree
Date: Tue, 12 Jun 2007 11:12:49
Message-Id: 466E7ED8.7020006@gentoo.org
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-dev] guidline to set a timeline of removal of ebuild from stable tree by cilly
1 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
2 Hash: SHA1
3
4 cilly wrote:
5 > please, understand that I do not want to `blame` any developer, unless
6 > it is discussed here with a final solution. Since I am not a gentoo-dev,
7 > some of the devs `may not understand` my concerns and probably `feel
8 > offended`.
9
10 Hi Cecilia,
11
12 Nobody will feel offended by your bug report. I'm asking you to go into
13 specifics precisely because I want to better understand what the exact problem
14 is. Or you could start using lilypond and tell me all that is wrong with it (a
15 lot). When 2.10.26 comes out in probably a few days I'll be removing all other
16 testing versions, except 2.11.26, because they have problems with the newest
17 fontforge. I hope 2.10.26 will be good enough to be stabled.
18
19 Marijn
20 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
21 Version: GnuPG v2.0.4 (GNU/Linux)
22 Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org
23
24 iD8DBQFGbn7Yp/VmCx0OL2wRAjM2AJ0UdBKDsb+u0CVHvttKwAakqKvLgACfYer9
25 9J70SOJpZNkMNIkXe30OnRo=
26 =9nCO
27 -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
28 --
29 gentoo-dev@g.o mailing list