1 |
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- |
2 |
Hash: SHA1 |
3 |
|
4 |
Michał Górny schrieb: |
5 |
> I don't know if you didn't read the proposal, or if you are unable to |
6 |
> understand it. You are seriously *offending* me and the few other |
7 |
> developers who are trying *really hard*. |
8 |
> |
9 |
> So let me make this clear: I am trying to make it possible for the |
10 |
> community to contribute in any way it finds *convenient* while not |
11 |
> forcing anyone to use any external (proprietary or non-proprietary) |
12 |
> platform. |
13 |
|
14 |
TBH I don't see any reason to be offended here. |
15 |
What Andrew is pointing out is that this path can be a slippery slope into |
16 |
dependency on GitHub infrastructure. |
17 |
|
18 |
>> It is a pain for me to see that several developers under disguise of |
19 |
>> "community" and "integration" are trying hard to make that happen, |
20 |
>> step by step. |
21 |
> |
22 |
> And it is a pain for us to read such unfounded accusations. This is |
23 |
> incorrect, and very offensive. If this is really your belief, please |
24 |
> keep it to yourself. By writing this you are only causing unnecessary |
25 |
> anger and frustration which are not helping anyone. |
26 |
|
27 |
That remark may have been unwarranted. FWIW I don't agree with it. |
28 |
But I don't think it lowers the anger-and-frustration standards of this |
29 |
discussion following: |
30 |
"Thank you for your insightful comment. That's very helpful. Really, |
31 |
thank you a lot. Gentoo would be much worse without such helpful |
32 |
comments. Why do we need community at all, when one developer with his |
33 |
helpful comments can provide all there is ever needed by the distro." |
34 |
|
35 |
|
36 |
Best regards, |
37 |
Chí-Thanh Christopher Nguyễn |
38 |
|
39 |
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- |
40 |
Version: GnuPG v2 |
41 |
|
42 |
iEYEARECAAYFAlX2B1MACgkQ+gvH2voEPRBP/QCaA3LtZHHhk7qjeUIXHIRm6eD1 |
43 |
90MAn3mmeFk1RmlqNbuSSflyMvx19c9x |
44 |
=6kAH |
45 |
-----END PGP SIGNATURE----- |