| 1 |
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- |
| 2 |
Hash: SHA1 |
| 3 |
|
| 4 |
On Apr 7, 2005, at 8:31 AM, Diego "Flameeyes" Pettenò wrote: |
| 5 |
|
| 6 |
> On Thursday 07 April 2005 14:01, Ciaran McCreesh wrote: |
| 7 |
>> The OS X sed is broken. Or, at least, it is not a satisfactory |
| 8 |
>> provider |
| 9 |
>> of sed-4, which is what we DEPEND upon. |
| 10 |
> Well osx's sed is just posix sed, exactly the same of bsd sed. |
| 11 |
> We depends on gsed for things which, imho, could be done using posix |
| 12 |
> sed. |
| 13 |
> Mainly the position of -i param, or the douple -e (which could be |
| 14 |
> merged into |
| 15 |
> a single expression). |
| 16 |
> Probably both osx sed and bsd sed could be used without a bit of a |
| 17 |
> trouble for |
| 18 |
> portage purposes, with some tweaks here and there. |
| 19 |
|
| 20 |
Interesting. I could've sworn the OSX sed didn't have the "-i" option, |
| 21 |
and it isn't in the manpage, but I just tried it and low and behold it |
| 22 |
exists now. Even so, it makes me nervous to depend on Apple not to |
| 23 |
change the available sed options in order to keep a working portage. |
| 24 |
gsed really isn't all that much trouble, and you can unmerge it if you |
| 25 |
decide that the portage experiment didn't work out for you. |
| 26 |
|
| 27 |
- --Lina Pezzella |
| 28 |
Ebuild/Porting Co-Lead |
| 29 |
Gentoo for Mac OS X |
| 30 |
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- |
| 31 |
Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (Darwin) |
| 32 |
|
| 33 |
iD8DBQFCVWW+NJ9STR9DbYERAm3DAKDPSFfaY9DsRr9PTuvbP5nvT/J+YwCgjxUi |
| 34 |
jqVpH1cCZ91RwM/QBI6fLlw= |
| 35 |
=Zc2W |
| 36 |
-----END PGP SIGNATURE----- |
| 37 |
|
| 38 |
|
| 39 |
-- |
| 40 |
gentoo-dev@g.o mailing list |
Archives