Gentoo Archives: gentoo-dev

From: Fabian Groffen <grobian@g.o>
To: gentoo-dev@l.g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] [rfc] repo_name/layman-global.txt overlay name mismatches
Date: Sun, 12 Jul 2009 09:52:29
Message-Id: 20090712095212.GE27784@gentoo.org
In Reply to: [gentoo-dev] [rfc] repo_name/layman-global.txt overlay name mismatches by Sebastian Pipping
1 On 12-07-2009 01:59:03 +0200, Sebastian Pipping wrote:
2 > Proposal
3 >
4 > - Make repo_name file fit layman-global.txt entry where it doesn't
5 > match at the moment
6 >
7 > - People with that overlay installed do not have to change
8 > anything, no "where did that overlay go" mails or aynthing
9 >
10 > - Upstream needs to be convinced to fix it
11 >
12 > - For packages installed from that overlay the file
13 > 'repository' will not update until the a re-installation
14 >
15 > - Make in-sync repo_name a requirement for extending
16 > layman-global.txt
17
18 since I assume you can't reliably use the checked out version of the
19 overlay (by e.g. layman), can you try to retrieve the repo_name file
20 from the overlay? Probably a lot of efforts. So alternative, what if
21 we extend the layman-global.txt (which is xml in reality...) file with
22 an extra property per overlay which holds the contents of it's
23 repo_name? Would be optimal, since you're fetching this file anyway to
24 check it. Alternative is to use another file somewhere on the interweb
25 that you keep up to date automatically, by having all overlays checked
26 out and recording their repo_name ...
27
28
29 --
30 Fabian Groffen
31 Gentoo on a different level

Replies