| 1 |
Gilles Dartiguelongue wrote: |
| 2 |
> Le jeudi 24 juillet 2008 à 18:36 +0200, Arfrever Frehtes Taifersar |
| 3 |
> Arahesis a écrit : |
| 4 |
>> I would like to suggest new policy stating that packages should respect LDFLAGS. |
| 5 |
>> Small amount of packages which ignore LDFLAGS should be patched to respect them. |
| 6 |
>> Such patches are usually small and easy to write. |
| 7 |
>> |
| 8 |
>> This policy is required to allow QA team to fix packages which ignore LDFLAGS. |
| 9 |
>> |
| 10 |
> |
| 11 |
> this question might sound stupid, but what are you actually trying to |
| 12 |
> fix ? What do these packages do or do not do by ignoring your ldflags |
| 13 |
> that is so crucial to you ? |
| 14 |
|
| 15 |
"-Wl,-O1,--hash-style=gnu,--sort-common,--as-needed" |
Archives