Archives
Archives
| From: | Gilles Dartiguelongue <eva@g.o> | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| To: | gentoo-dev@l.g.o | ||
| Subject: | Re: [gentoo-dev] [RFC] New policy: LDFLAGS should be respected | ||
| Date: | Fri, 25 Jul 2008 23:08:04 | ||
| Message-Id: | 1217027262.14879.1.camel@su.perronet.esiee.net | ||
| In Reply to: | [gentoo-dev] [RFC] New policy: LDFLAGS should be respected by Arfrever Frehtes Taifersar Arahesis |
||
| 1 | Le jeudi 24 juillet 2008 à 18:36 +0200, Arfrever Frehtes Taifersar |
| 2 | Arahesis a écrit : |
| 3 | > I would like to suggest new policy stating that packages should respect LDFLAGS. |
| 4 | > Small amount of packages which ignore LDFLAGS should be patched to respect them. |
| 5 | > Such patches are usually small and easy to write. |
| 6 | > |
| 7 | > This policy is required to allow QA team to fix packages which ignore LDFLAGS. |
| 8 | > |
| 9 | |
| 10 | this question might sound stupid, but what are you actually trying to |
| 11 | fix ? What do these packages do or do not do by ignoring your ldflags |
| 12 | that is so crucial to you ? |
| 13 | |
| 14 | -- |
| 15 | Gilles Dartiguelongue <eva@g.o> |
| 16 | Gentoo |
| File name | MIME type |
|---|---|
| signature.asc | application/pgp-signature |
| Subject | Author |
|---|---|
| [gentoo-dev] Re: [RFC] New policy: LDFLAGS should be respected | Nikos Chantziaras <realnc@×××××.de> |
| Re: [gentoo-dev] [RFC] New policy: LDFLAGS should be respected | Arfrever Frehtes Taifersar Arahesis <arfrever.fta@×××××.com> |