| 1 |
Harald van Dijk wrote: |
| 2 |
> On Sun, Oct 29, 2006 at 07:15:01PM -0800, David Shakaryan wrote: |
| 3 |
>> The desktop-wm herd is understaffed and has a bunch of dead packages |
| 4 |
>> lying around which no one wants to maintain. I tried to give a valid |
| 5 |
>> alternative for all of the packages I want removed. At first glance, it |
| 6 |
>> seems like all of the following packages also have a dead upstream. |
| 7 |
>> |
| 8 |
>> x11-wm/larswm -- alternative: pekwm |
| 9 |
> |
| 10 |
> While the last release is from over two years ago, it still works |
| 11 |
> great and has no open bugs. Would you consider keeping it around at |
| 12 |
> least as long as that remains so? |
| 13 |
> |
| 14 |
> (I'll comment on the bug later.) |
| 15 |
|
| 16 |
Sure. Just make a comment telling treecleaners to keep it. You can |
| 17 |
mention that I'm okay with that, if you wish. |
| 18 |
|
| 19 |
-- |
| 20 |
David Shakaryan |
| 21 |
GnuPG Public Key: 0x4B8FE14B |
Archives