Gentoo Archives: gentoo-dev

From: Peter Stuge <peter@×××××.se>
To: gentoo-dev@l.g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: [OT/NIT] Re: Re: [gentoo-commits] gentoo-x86 commit in profiles: ChangeLog package.mask
Date: Wed, 24 Apr 2013 11:25:26
Message-Id: 20130424112516.26288.qmail@stuge.se
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: [OT/NIT] Re: Re: [gentoo-commits] gentoo-x86 commit in profiles: ChangeLog package.mask by Peter Stuge
1 Peter Stuge wrote:
2 > Jeroen Roovers wrote:
3 > > Er, you can't be seriously suggesting we will drop repoman checks
4 > > with the migration to git? I don't see how that would benefit anyone.
5 >
6 > I would argue that repoman and/or corresponding checks should be run
7 > by a CI system hooked up to the Gerrit instance that developers push to.
8 >
9 > Anything else is IMO waste of developers' time and minds.
10
11 Sorry, I meant to write: "Anything less"
12
13
14 //Peter