From: | Peter Stuge <peter@×××××.se> | ||
---|---|---|---|
To: | gentoo-dev@l.g.o | ||
Subject: | Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: [OT/NIT] Re: Re: [gentoo-commits] gentoo-x86 commit in profiles: ChangeLog package.mask | ||
Date: | Wed, 24 Apr 2013 11:21:37 | ||
Message-Id: | 20130424112129.25885.qmail@stuge.se | ||
In Reply to: | Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: [OT/NIT] Re: Re: [gentoo-commits] gentoo-x86 commit in profiles: ChangeLog package.mask by Jeroen Roovers |
1 | Jeroen Roovers wrote: |
2 | > Er, you can't be seriously suggesting we will drop repoman checks |
3 | > with the migration to git? I don't see how that would benefit anyone. |
4 | |
5 | I would argue that repoman and/or corresponding checks should be run |
6 | by a CI system hooked up to the Gerrit instance that developers push to. |
7 | |
8 | Anything else is IMO waste of developers' time and minds. |
9 | |
10 | |
11 | //Peter |
Subject | Author |
---|---|
Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: [OT/NIT] Re: Re: [gentoo-commits] gentoo-x86 commit in profiles: ChangeLog package.mask | Peter Stuge <peter@×××××.se> |
Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: [OT/NIT] Re: Re: [gentoo-commits] gentoo-x86 commit in profiles: ChangeLog package.mask | Michael Mol <mikemol@×××××.com> |
Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: [OT/NIT] Re: Re: [gentoo-commits] gentoo-x86 commit in profiles: ChangeLog package.mask | Patrick Lauer <patrick@g.o> |