| 1 |
On 11/3/20 10:10 AM, Michał Górny wrote: |
| 2 |
> I'm with you on this though I think it should be relaxed to disallow |
| 3 |
> only long term presence of pure live packages. It's fine to add a live |
| 4 |
> ebuild first for a month or two if you're still working on something |
| 5 |
> (just like it's fine to add a masked package). However, it's not fine |
| 6 |
> to leave things like this for years. |
| 7 |
> |
| 8 |
> That said, maybe the policy should cover 'long-term masked packages' |
| 9 |
> in general. See below. |
| 10 |
> |
| 11 |
Initially Arfrever suggested the same, I wasn't a fan of it because I |
| 12 |
believe it's much simpler to make this into a pkgcheck/repoman check |
| 13 |
like this. |
| 14 |
|
| 15 |
However with pkgcheck maybe a similar logic can be used as is used with |
| 16 |
StableRequestCheck. So no objections there I guess. |
| 17 |
|
| 18 |
-- juippis |
Archives