1 |
Lance Albertson wrote: |
2 |
> Aron Griffis wrote: |
3 |
>> Grant Goodyear wrote: [Tue Jan 10 2006, 11:09:15AM EST] |
4 |
>> |
5 |
>>> As an aside, it's ciarnanm has already put work in on developing an RST to |
6 |
>>> guidexml converter, so I wouldn't worry too much about RST not scaling. |
7 |
>> |
8 |
>> Could that be used dynamically on the server? The last time I was |
9 |
>> familiar with the gentoo.org server, it was running axkit and |
10 |
>> dynamically generating HTML from the GuideXML. Is it a relatively |
11 |
>> simple matter to support .rst files in the same manner? |
12 |
> |
13 |
> Actually, we're moving away from axkit because its a PITA to maintain. |
14 |
> Currently, two of the three web nodes are running a home grown app |
15 |
> called gorg that runs via ruby. It seems to work rather well. |
16 |
> |
17 |
>> A related question: How hard would it be to enable the dynamic |
18 |
>> generation for dev.gentoo.org/~users? That would make development of |
19 |
>> RST or GuideXML documents *much* simpler, since we could just work on |
20 |
>> the file in our public_html and test render it by accessing through |
21 |
>> a web browser. |
22 |
> |
23 |
> Last I knew, its not a simple task for generating those nice looking |
24 |
> html pages that ciaranm made a while back for the developer docs. When I |
25 |
> asked him about (he can probably provide more detail), It took a lot of |
26 |
> processing time and wasn't that scalable. Now, I'm not sure if anything |
27 |
> has changed since then. |
28 |
> |
29 |
> I can probably setup toucan to use gorg in some fashion if I had a few |
30 |
> folks to test it with. I'm sure that would make things easier for a lot |
31 |
> of people for rendering things. |
32 |
> |
33 |
|
34 |
yes and it would be much appreciated to have this possibility on |
35 |
d.g.o/~users/ . |
36 |
|
37 |
tester += me, if that can help. |
38 |
|
39 |
-- |
40 |
gentoo-dev@g.o mailing list |