1 |
Wulf C. Krueger <philantrop@g.o> wrote: |
2 |
> In the conversation with you, Matti, he argues that elog is |
3 |
> not "prominent" enough, users don't read USE flag descriptions, etc. |
4 |
> So those issues seem unresolved. |
5 |
|
6 |
Well, this arguments are nothing new, just read this ml.. |
7 |
However, i don't think think his reasoning is justified here. We do |
8 |
inform the user, everything else is not within our reach. And imho the |
9 |
license doesn't require more. |
10 |
If i get a cease and desist over *that*, well, screw it. |
11 |
-- |
12 |
Regards, Matti Bickel |
13 |
Encrypted/Signed Email preferred |