Gentoo Archives: gentoo-dev

From: Matti Bickel <mabi@g.o>
To: gentoo-dev@l.g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] RFC: ion license
Date: Sun, 13 May 2007 08:46:52
Message-Id: 20070513084108.GC6546@pluto.local
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-dev] RFC: ion license by "Wulf C. Krueger"
1 Wulf C. Krueger <philantrop@g.o> wrote:
2 > In the conversation with you, Matti, he argues that elog is
3 > not "prominent" enough, users don't read USE flag descriptions, etc.
4 > So those issues seem unresolved.
5
6 Well, this arguments are nothing new, just read this ml..
7 However, i don't think think his reasoning is justified here. We do
8 inform the user, everything else is not within our reach. And imho the
9 license doesn't require more.
10 If i get a cease and desist over *that*, well, screw it.
11 --
12 Regards, Matti Bickel
13 Encrypted/Signed Email preferred