| 1 |
On Sunday, May 13, 2007 09:57:05 AM Matti Bickel wrote: |
| 2 |
> If the general feeling is that ion is |
| 3 |
> unacceptable in the tree, i'll mask it pending removal. |
| 4 |
|
| 5 |
Having read the threads you referenced, I don't think there's much room |
| 6 |
for a compromise. |
| 7 |
|
| 8 |
In the conversation with you, Matti, he argues that elog is |
| 9 |
not "prominent" enough, users don't read USE flag descriptions, etc. |
| 10 |
So those issues seem unresolved. |
| 11 |
|
| 12 |
Reading the rest of those mail exchanges makes it even look worse. |
| 13 |
|
| 14 |
I don't think he'll ever really be satisfied. So I'd suggest to drop ion3. |
| 15 |
|
| 16 |
Best regards, Wulf |
Archives