Gentoo Archives: gentoo-dev

From: Duncan <1i5t5.duncan@×××.net>
To: gentoo-dev@l.g.o
Subject: [gentoo-dev] Re: Re: package naming
Date: Tue, 21 Mar 2006 14:13:29
Message-Id: pan.2006.03.21.14.00.06.809082@cox.net
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: package naming by Chris Gianelloni
1 Chris Gianelloni posted <1142886036.32640.16.camel@×××××××××××××××××.net>,
2 excerpted below, on Mon, 20 Mar 2006 15:20:35 -0500:
3
4 > On Mon, 2006-03-20 at 12:37 -0700, Duncan wrote:
5 >> Agreed if keeping the old name with a gentoo prefix/suffix is chosen.
6 >> However, nearly all Gentoo system tools are e<whatever> (not only portage
7 >> related either, as there's eselect), so I'd suggest eresolv.
8 >
9 > He was referring to the *package* name.
10
11 Uh... I think I was too sleepy or something. =8^)
12
13 Thanks.
14
15 --
16 Duncan - List replies preferred. No HTML msgs.
17 "Every nonfree program has a lord, a master --
18 and if you use the program, he is your master." Richard Stallman in
19 http://www.linuxdevcenter.com/pub/a/linux/2004/12/22/rms_interview.html
20
21
22 --
23 gentoo-dev@g.o mailing list