Archives
Archives
| From: | Chris Gianelloni <wolf31o2@g.o> | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| To: | gentoo-dev@l.g.o | ||
| Subject: | Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: package naming | ||
| Date: | Mon, 20 Mar 2006 20:26:56 | ||
| Message-Id: | 1142886036.32640.16.camel@cgianelloni.nuvox.net | ||
| In Reply to: | [gentoo-dev] Re: package naming by Duncan <1i5t5.duncan@cox.net> | ||
| 1 | On Mon, 2006-03-20 at 12:37 -0700, Duncan wrote: |
| 2 | > Agreed if keeping the old name with a gentoo prefix/suffix is chosen. |
| 3 | > However, nearly all Gentoo system tools are e<whatever> (not only portage |
| 4 | > related either, as there's eselect), so I'd suggest eresolv. |
| 5 | |
| 6 | He was referring to the *package* name. |
| 7 | |
| 8 | -- |
| 9 | Chris Gianelloni |
| 10 | Release Engineering - Strategic Lead |
| 11 | x86 Architecture Team |
| 12 | Games - Developer |
| 13 | Gentoo Linux |
| File name | MIME type |
|---|---|
| signature.asc | application/pgp-signature |
| Subject | Author |
|---|---|
| [gentoo-dev] Re: Re: package naming | Duncan <1i5t5.duncan@×××.net> |