| 1 |
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- |
| 2 |
Hash: SHA1 |
| 3 |
|
| 4 |
On Mon, 7 Aug 2006, Peter Gordon wrote: |
| 5 |
|
| 6 |
> Zac Medico wrote: |
| 7 |
>> The difference with use.force is that it prevents flags, that are deemed |
| 8 |
>> extremely important, from being accidentally disabled by the user. |
| 9 |
> |
| 10 |
> If they were so "extremely important" then they would not be optional, |
| 11 |
> and hence not even be USE flags at all, no? Or am I missing something? |
| 12 |
|
| 13 |
This could allow for us to get rid of the nofoo use flag nomenclature that |
| 14 |
folks have been doing for functionality that is highly suggested to be on |
| 15 |
by default. |
| 16 |
|
| 17 |
Cheers, |
| 18 |
- -- |
| 19 |
Jason Wever |
| 20 |
Gentoo/Sparc Team Co-Lead |
| 21 |
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- |
| 22 |
Version: GnuPG v1.4.5 (GNU/Linux) |
| 23 |
|
| 24 |
iD8DBQFE2Nc2dKvgdVioq28RAuwsAJ4vK8SgA1ghZmon2zRWIltyA/8OCQCcD6Dn |
| 25 |
XYD/+4B+vVEDYpz9ahGpcxM= |
| 26 |
=cP0R |
| 27 |
-----END PGP SIGNATURE----- |
| 28 |
-- |
| 29 |
gentoo-dev@g.o mailing list |
Archives