Archives
Archives
| From: | Peter Gordon <codergeek42@g.o> | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| To: | gentoo-dev@l.g.o | ||
| Subject: | Re: [gentoo-dev] use.force as a complement to use.mask in profiles | ||
| Date: | Tue, 08 Aug 2006 04:45:03 | ||
| Message-Id: | 44D81592.8030708@gentoo.org | ||
| In Reply to: | Re: [gentoo-dev] use.force as a complement to use.mask in profiles by Zac Medico |
||
| 1 | Zac Medico wrote: |
| 2 | > The difference with use.force is that it prevents flags, that are deemed |
| 3 | > extremely important, from being accidentally disabled by the user. |
| 4 | |
| 5 | If they were so "extremely important" then they would not be optional, |
| 6 | and hence not even be USE flags at all, no? Or am I missing something? |
| 7 | -- |
| 8 | Peter Gordon (codergeek42) |
| 9 | Gentoo Forums Global Moderator |
| 10 | GnuPG Public Key ID: 0xFFC19479 / Fingerprint: |
| 11 | DD68 A414 56BD 6368 D957 9666 4268 CB7A FFC1 9479 |
| 12 | My Blog: http://thecodergeek.com/blog/ |
| File name | MIME type |
|---|---|
| signature.asc | application/pgp-signature |
| Subject | Author |
|---|---|
| Re: [gentoo-dev] use.force as a complement to use.mask in profiles | Ryan Tandy <tarpman@×××××.com> |
| Re: [gentoo-dev] use.force as a complement to use.mask in profiles | Ciaran McCreesh <ciaran.mccreesh@×××××××××××××.uk> |
| Re: [gentoo-dev] use.force as a complement to use.mask in profiles | Simon Stelling <blubb@g.o> |
| Re: [gentoo-dev] use.force as a complement to use.mask in profiles | Jason Wever <weeve@g.o> |