Gentoo Archives: gentoo-dev

From: Simon Stelling <blubb@g.o>
To: gentoo-dev@l.g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] use.force as a complement to use.mask in profiles
Date: Tue, 08 Aug 2006 08:14:46
Message-Id: 44D83FD8.4040408@gentoo.org
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-dev] use.force as a complement to use.mask in profiles by Peter Gordon
1 Peter Gordon wrote:
2 > Zac Medico wrote:
3 >> The difference with use.force is that it prevents flags, that are deemed
4 >> extremely important, from being accidentally disabled by the user.
5 >
6 > If they were so "extremely important" then they would not be optional,
7 > and hence not even be USE flags at all, no? Or am I missing something?
8
9 Yes. Some flags are extremely important to certain users (read: profiles) but
10 not to others. In some cases the USE flag are so extremely important because
11 they are more or less what makes the whole profile. Think of 'selinux' or
12 'multilib'.
13
14 http://article.gmane.org/gmane.linux.gentoo.portage.devel/2316
15
16 --
17 Kind Regards,
18
19 Simon Stelling
20 Gentoo/AMD64 Developer
21 --
22 gentoo-dev@g.o mailing list