Gentoo Archives: gentoo-dev

From: Ciaran McCreesh <ciaran.mccreesh@×××××××××××××.uk>
To: gentoo-dev@l.g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] use.force as a complement to use.mask in profiles
Date: Tue, 08 Aug 2006 06:40:59
Message-Id: 20060808073534.5d458bdf@snowdrop.home
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-dev] use.force as a complement to use.mask in profiles by Peter Gordon
1 On Mon, 07 Aug 2006 21:39:46 -0700 Peter Gordon
2 <codergeek42@g.o> wrote:
3 | Zac Medico wrote:
4 | > The difference with use.force is that it prevents flags, that are
5 | > deemed extremely important, from being accidentally disabled by the
6 | > user.
7 |
8 | If they were so "extremely important" then they would not be optional,
9 | and hence not even be USE flags at all, no? Or am I missing something?
10
11 You're missing something. Vim used to have an ncurses USE flag, that
12 would switch it between using ncurses and termcap-compat. On some
13 archs, only ncurses was available, so some way was needed to force
14 the use flag.
15
16 --
17 Ciaran McCreesh
18 Mail : ciaran dot mccreesh at blueyonder.co.uk
19
20
21 --
22 gentoo-dev@g.o mailing list

Replies

Subject Author
Re: [gentoo-dev] use.force as a complement to use.mask in profiles Peter Gordon <codergeek42@g.o>