| 1 |
On Saturday 14 December 2002 21:02, Dan Armak wrote: |
| 2 |
> Hello, |
| 3 |
> |
| 4 |
> So I'm asking our users & other developers for their opinion on this. Are |
| 5 |
> there any objections to not adding kde2 app ebuilds (of course there might |
| 6 |
> be exceptions for important stuff, but as a general rule) on these grounds? |
| 7 |
> Does anyone want such stuff? |
| 8 |
|
| 9 |
I agree with you on the assessment on the "being dormant" of the projects. |
| 10 |
Personally I also only use kde-3 |
| 11 |
|
| 12 |
> |
| 13 |
> As a followup question: who uses kde 2.2.2 at all on Gentoo, and why? I |
| 14 |
> don't propose removing kde2 and existing kde2 app ebuilds from portage, I'm |
| 15 |
> just curious. |
| 16 |
> |
| 17 |
> (I'm not posting on gentoo-user because I'm not subscribed there; someone |
| 18 |
> please forward this there, we might as well have a big discussion as |
| 19 |
> possible and close this issue once and for all.) |
| 20 |
|
| 21 |
Maybe an option would be to have people (Not you Dan) port the apps to kde-3 |
| 22 |
as for most apps it isn't that troublesome at all. |
| 23 |
|
| 24 |
Paul |
| 25 |
|
| 26 |
-- |
| 27 |
Paul de Vrieze |
| 28 |
Junior Researcher |
| 29 |
Mail: pauldv@××××××.nl |
| 30 |
Homepage: http://www.devrieze.net |
| 31 |
|
| 32 |
|
| 33 |
-- |
| 34 |
gentoo-dev@g.o mailing list |
Archives