1 |
On Monday 08 September 2003 10:15, Marius Mauch wrote: |
2 |
> On 09/08/03 Jason Stubbs wrote: |
3 |
> > Hello all, |
4 |
> > |
5 |
> > I pruned my world file to include only the software I want and then |
6 |
> > ran "emerge -p depclean" to find that nano appeared on the list. I |
7 |
> > added it to my world file and have cleared out old software. However, |
8 |
> > checking /etc/make.profile/packages, I find that nano has in fact been |
9 |
> > removed. In fact, there isn't any editor listed as part of the base |
10 |
> > system. Is this correct? |
11 |
> |
12 |
> There is a virtual/editor so you can use another editor than nano in |
13 |
> system. All editors should provide virtual/editor. |
14 |
|
15 |
Ahhh.. So because something I have installed depends on app-editors/emacs, |
16 |
that did not get removed and because app-editors/nano was not in the world |
17 |
file and virtual/editor was already fulfilled by app-editors/emacs, depclean |
18 |
was happy to get rid of it. |
19 |
|
20 |
In that case, is app-editors/nano in the world file on a new setup? If not, |
21 |
should it be? |
22 |
|
23 |
Regards, |
24 |
Jason |
25 |
|
26 |
-- |
27 |
gentoo-dev@g.o mailing list |