| 1 |
On 01/09/2014 08:20 PM, Mike Frysinger wrote: |
| 2 |
> On Monday 09 December 2013 16:32:09 Markos Chandras wrote: |
| 3 |
>> On 12/09/2013 02:21 PM, Diego Elio Pettenò wrote: |
| 4 |
>>> On Mon, Dec 9, 2013 at 2:20 PM, Pacho Ramos <pacho@g.o> wrote: |
| 5 |
>>>> Hello |
| 6 |
>>>> |
| 7 |
>>>> Is pam team still active? I wonder about this as, recently, we have |
| 8 |
>>>> needed to go ahead and fix some bugs related, for example, with pambase |
| 9 |
>>>> and pam_ssh |
| 10 |
>>>> |
| 11 |
>>>> Thanks for the info :) |
| 12 |
>> |
| 13 |
>> So I guess it's time to call for maintainers or we should consider |
| 14 |
>> merging this herd with another one (base?) to avoid unattended bugs for |
| 15 |
>> a long time. |
| 16 |
> |
| 17 |
> well, the sep herd was kind of by design ... i didn't want it cluttering up |
| 18 |
> base-system@ and it is super convenient to abdicate all PAM decisions to a |
| 19 |
> single herd. |
| 20 |
> -mike |
| 21 |
> |
| 22 |
I understand that but if nobody is tracking pam@ then what's the point? |
| 23 |
|
| 24 |
-- |
| 25 |
Regards, |
| 26 |
Markos Chandras |
Archives