| 1 |
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- |
| 2 |
Hash: SHA1 |
| 3 |
|
| 4 |
Anthony Gorecki wrote: |
| 5 |
> On Sunday, February 27, 2005 9:13 am, Ciaran McCreesh wrote: |
| 6 |
> |
| 7 |
>>How about we recognise that individual ebuilds aren't worth anything |
| 8 |
>>and that the tree *as a whole* should be copyrighted as a single work? |
| 9 |
> |
| 10 |
> |
| 11 |
> This seems like a sensible idea, presuming the developers make certain that |
| 12 |
> the ebuilds which are committed to the tree are licensed under the GPL. I do, |
| 13 |
> however, believe that the original author of a newly contributed ebuild |
| 14 |
> deserves at least to have his name mentioned as such in the file. |
| 15 |
|
| 16 |
They should be mentioned in the ChangeLog. If they aren't, get in touch |
| 17 |
w/ the dev who committed it. |
| 18 |
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- |
| 19 |
Version: GnuPG v1.4.0 (GNU/Linux) |
| 20 |
|
| 21 |
iD8DBQFCIqgBXVaO67S1rtsRAgLAAKDL4pJzJPVjOF9ykxWF75RCtduQTQCg/gSE |
| 22 |
eY4y0vQTQ66eGg/QN6pf+1o= |
| 23 |
=LeQK |
| 24 |
-----END PGP SIGNATURE----- |
| 25 |
-- |
| 26 |
gentoo-dev@g.o mailing list |
Archives