From: | Anthony Gorecki <anthony@××××××××××.com> | ||
---|---|---|---|
To: | gentoo-dev@××××××××××××.org | ||
Subject: | Re: [gentoo-dev] Copyright assignment and ownership (again) | ||
Date: | Mon, 28 Feb 2005 02:05:42 | ||
Message-Id: | 200502271803.01417.anthony@ectrolinux.com | ||
In Reply to: | Re: [gentoo-dev] Copyright assignment and ownership (again) by Ciaran McCreesh |
1 | On Sunday, February 27, 2005 9:13 am, Ciaran McCreesh wrote: |
2 | > How about we recognise that individual ebuilds aren't worth anything |
3 | > and that the tree *as a whole* should be copyrighted as a single work? |
4 | |
5 | This seems like a sensible idea, presuming the developers make certain that |
6 | the ebuilds which are committed to the tree are licensed under the GPL. I do, |
7 | however, believe that the original author of a newly contributed ebuild |
8 | deserves at least to have his name mentioned as such in the file. |
9 | |
10 | |
11 | -- |
12 | Anthony Gorecki |
13 | Ectro-Linux Foundation |
Subject | Author |
---|---|
Re: [gentoo-dev] Copyright assignment and ownership (again) | Donnie Berkholz <spyderous@g.o> |
Re: [gentoo-dev] Copyright assignment and ownership (again) | Chris Gianelloni <wolf31o2@g.o> |