| 1 |
On 11/18/2012 03:19 AM, Greg KH wrote: |
| 2 |
> On Sun, Nov 18, 2012 at 03:10:08AM -0500, Richard Yao wrote: |
| 3 |
>> You are the one claiming that this is our official fork. None of us are. |
| 4 |
> |
| 5 |
> It's on the Gentoo github site, and it has the Gentoo Foundation |
| 6 |
> copyright all over all of the files in one of the branches, reviewed by |
| 7 |
> you. |
| 8 |
> |
| 9 |
> I think I would be pretty foolish if I somehow thought it was _not_ an |
| 10 |
> official fork :) |
| 11 |
> |
| 12 |
>> This will be an official Gentoo project when we make the announcement in |
| 13 |
>> the next few days. That makes it one project of many. GLEP 0039 clearly |
| 14 |
>> states how this works. If you are unhappy with GLEP 0039, then you |
| 15 |
>> should discuss that with the council. |
| 16 |
> |
| 17 |
> I fail to see how 0039 has to do with this, please explain. I also |
| 18 |
> don't see the copyright issue here, nor do I see where the decision of |
| 19 |
> the council was made. |
| 20 |
> |
| 21 |
> Again, that's my original question, "What is the decision of the council |
| 22 |
> regarding this issue"? |
| 23 |
> |
| 24 |
> thanks, |
| 25 |
> |
| 26 |
> greg k-h |
| 27 |
|
| 28 |
I am sick of the harassment that I have received from you and a few |
| 29 |
others both in public and in private. The public branch has been |
| 30 |
deleted. Come back after we have done our first release. Otherwise, |
| 31 |
leave us alone. That is all that I have to say. |
Archives