| 1 |
On Thursday 20 October 2005 10:19 pm, Dave Nebinger wrote: |
| 2 |
> >> > i still dont see how this addresses the nocxx / USE=-* |
| 3 |
> >> |
| 4 |
> >> noFOO is used because "FOO" is on by default, and noFOO turns it off. |
| 5 |
> >> AutoUSE is the same way, package bar is included in the buildplan and to |
| 6 |
> >> have sane defaults, certain flags are turned on. |
| 7 |
> > |
| 8 |
> > that was a great explanation however irrelevant it may have been |
| 9 |
> > |
| 10 |
> > i guess we will have to make 'nocxx' a special case as we strip all other |
| 11 |
> > 'no*' USE flags from portage |
| 12 |
> |
| 13 |
> Sorry, guys, but isn't that what "-FOO" is supposed to be for? If we |
| 14 |
> already have support for "-FOO", why then do we need a "noFOO" also? |
| 15 |
> |
| 16 |
> Or is there some distinction I'm missing here? |
| 17 |
|
| 18 |
you're missing the fact that if we change 'nocxx' to 'cxx' then everyone who |
| 19 |
uses '-*' in their USE flags will emerge their gcc without C++ support |
| 20 |
-mike |
| 21 |
-- |
| 22 |
gentoo-dev@g.o mailing list |
Archives