| 1 |
Daniel Campbell posted on Sun, 15 May 2016 04:04:57 -0700 as excerpted: |
| 2 |
|
| 3 |
> If the dev in question hasn't done that before, then it's entirely |
| 4 |
> possible they *thought* they tested, or tested it *before* making some |
| 5 |
> other edit and absent-mindedly committed. |
| 6 |
|
| 7 |
Again, legacy CVS thought pattern. In git, commit != push, and it's the |
| 8 |
push that's critical. |
| 9 |
|
| 10 |
Commit all you want without testing. Just test (and fix if necessary) |
| 11 |
before you push those commits up to the gentoo master repo. =:^) |
| 12 |
|
| 13 |
(Of course, rebasing to fold the broken commit and its fix into one |
| 14 |
before pushing doesn't hurt, either.) |
| 15 |
|
| 16 |
-- |
| 17 |
Duncan - List replies preferred. No HTML msgs. |
| 18 |
"Every nonfree program has a lord, a master -- |
| 19 |
and if you use the program, he is your master." Richard Stallman |
Archives