1 |
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- |
2 |
Hash: SHA1 |
3 |
|
4 |
Marius Mauch wrote: |
5 |
> In that case adding >=bash-3 to "system" isn't sufficient. I'll leave |
6 |
> the detailed explanation to Brian, but the only thing you can rely on |
7 |
> in the ebuild environment is what the used portage version has in it's |
8 |
> dep strings when it was merged. |
9 |
|
10 |
Isn't that true only for stuff in ebuild's global scope? |
11 |
|
12 |
> Not that it has much practical relevance given the age of bash-3 |
13 |
> and things depending on it (don't think anybody is still on bash-2), |
14 |
> but adding it to "system" wouldn't help those people. |
15 |
|
16 |
This reminded me of this bug [1] we once got about OSX having only 2.59, |
17 |
not sure if that still holds. |
18 |
|
19 |
[1] http://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=139899 |
20 |
|
21 |
- -- |
22 |
Vlastimil Babka (Caster) |
23 |
Gentoo/Java |
24 |
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- |
25 |
Version: GnuPG v1.4.5 (GNU/Linux) |
26 |
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org |
27 |
|
28 |
iD8DBQFFMBg6tbrAj05h3oQRAoiUAJ9yFsRUPcPTyNvEQyH5XJztEN3e9gCfVI1Y |
29 |
k/hDaCTY6d89xHaklWlPj1E= |
30 |
=Mw45 |
31 |
-----END PGP SIGNATURE----- |
32 |
-- |
33 |
gentoo-dev@g.o mailing list |