Gentoo Archives: gentoo-dev

From: Roy Marples <uberlord@g.o>
To: gentoo-dev@l.g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] 2.6.18 going stable in 1 week
Date: Fri, 20 Oct 2006 08:03:36
Message-Id: 200610200900.29806.uberlord@gentoo.org
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-dev] 2.6.18 going stable in 1 week by Thomas Cort
1 On Friday 20 October 2006 03:46, Thomas Cort wrote:
2 > On Thu, 19 Oct 2006 21:21:21 -0400
3 >
4 > Daniel Drake <dsd@g.o> wrote:
5 > > This is your 1 week warning.. fix any packages which don't compile and
6 > > ensure the fix is also in the stable tree.
7 >
8 > What package(s) are going stable in 1 week? I have no clue what you are
9 > writing about since you didn't mention it in your e-mail. I did a
10 > quick search and found the following 6 packages which have a version
11 > 2.6.18:
12 >
13 > vanilla-sources-2.6.18
14 >
15 > You also neglected to mention which architectures are going stable. Are
16 > all arches going stable at the same time (in 1 week)? Will you still
17 > go ahead with the stable marking if http://bugs.gentoo.org/148429 is
18 > not resolved?
19
20 Which brings up another point of note - we support different kernels and
21 userlands now in the shape of Gentoo/FreeBSD on x86 and sparc64. So
22 should "vanilla-sources" be renamed to "linux-sources" so it's more accurate?
23
24 FWIW, baselayout 1.13 can use either GNU or BSD userland - hopefully one day
25 portage (or package manager of choice) can too :)
26
27 Thanks
28
29 --
30 Roy Marples <uberlord@g.o>
31 Gentoo/Linux Developer (baselayout, networking)
32 --
33 gentoo-dev@g.o mailing list

Replies

Subject Author
Re: [gentoo-dev] 2.6.18 going stable in 1 week Mike Auty <ikelos@g.o>
Re: [gentoo-dev] 2.6.18 going stable in 1 week Marius Mauch <genone@g.o>