| 1 |
On Fri, 21 Jun 2013 21:08:45 +0200 |
| 2 |
"Andreas K. Huettel" <dilfridge@g.o> wrote: |
| 3 |
|
| 4 |
> Am Freitag, 21. Juni 2013, 14:50:29 schrieb Markos Chandras: |
| 5 |
|
| 6 |
> > That is true. There is nothing special about there m-w bugs. They are |
| 7 |
> > still unresolved bugs, for many years. No need to treat |
| 8 |
> > them differently. |
| 9 |
|
| 10 |
> How can a m-w bug be resolved? Adding the package is unlikely to happen if |
| 11 |
> last request came years ago. |
| 12 |
> |
| 13 |
> My suggestion would be (this is how I handled it in printing): |
| 14 |
> |
| 15 |
> 1) leave message on bug |
| 16 |
> "Is anyone still interested in this?" |
| 17 |
> |
| 18 |
> 2) if noone replies in 2 months, resolve as obsolete |
| 19 |
|
| 20 |
Of course that would knock them off the list. :) |
| 21 |
|
| 22 |
Maybe we could have two lists for each year - one with and one without m-w bugs. |
| 23 |
|
| 24 |
|
| 25 |
-- |
| 26 |
Ryan Hill psn: dirtyepic_sk |
| 27 |
gcc-porting/toolchain/wxwidgets @ gentoo.org |
| 28 |
|
| 29 |
47C3 6D62 4864 0E49 8E9E 7F92 ED38 BD49 957A 8463 |
Archives