Gentoo Archives: gentoo-dev

From: Stuart Herbert <stuart@g.o>
To: gentoo-dev@l.g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] re2c woes - badly broken with gcc 3.x - offering help, possible ebuild maintainership
Date: Tue, 13 Apr 2004 18:25:38
Message-Id: 200404131935.27287.stuart@gentoo.org
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-dev] re2c woes - badly broken with gcc 3.x - offering help, possible ebuild maintainership by Elfyn McBratney
1 On Tuesday 13 April 2004 10:25, Elfyn McBratney wrote:
2 > Replying to myself as I've had some sleep and have now come to the
3 > conclusion my patch is fit only for the bin. :)
4 >
5 > I'm going to get on the re2c mailing list and try and push most of this
6 > upstream (the bulk are general portability changes, not really gentoo
7 > specific). I'll comment on bug #43449 when I have something that isn't
8 > kludge. ;)
9 >
10 > Sorry for the noise 8)
11 >
12 > Elfyn
13
14 Heh - I appreciate you taking the time to look at this for us. Let me know
15 when you've got something you want us to look at.
16
17 Best regards,
18 Stu
19 --
20 Stuart Herbert stuart@g.o
21 Gentoo Developer http://www.gentoo.org/
22 Missed the php|cruise? http://dev.gentoo.org/~stuart/cruise-2004/
23
24 GnuGP key id# F9AFC57C available from http://pgp.mit.edu
25 Key fingerprint = 31FB 50D4 1F88 E227 F319 C549 0C2F 80BA F9AF C57C
26 --

Replies

Subject Author
Re: [gentoo-dev] re2c woes - badly broken with gcc 3.x - offering help, possible ebuild maintainership Elfyn McBratney <elfyn.mcbratney@×××××××.uk>