| 1 |
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- |
| 2 |
Hash: SHA1 |
| 3 |
|
| 4 |
On Tuesday 13 Apr 2004 06:41, Elfyn McBratney wrote: |
| 5 |
> On Sunday 11 Apr 2004 16:40, Stuart Herbert wrote: |
| 6 |
> > On Saturday 10 April 2004 05:46, Elfyn McBratney wrote: |
| 7 |
> > > Hello devs, |
| 8 |
> > > |
| 9 |
> > > Before I begin, sorry if I should have sent this to the -user list.. |
| 10 |
> > > Please forward it there/moan at me if so. :) |
| 11 |
> > > |
| 12 |
> > > At the moment, re2c is completely broken w.r.t. gcc 3.x. And as most |
| 13 |
> > > people are living on the bleedin' edge (i.e., not using gcc 2.x) re2c |
| 14 |
> > > is completely broken for them. |
| 15 |
> > |
| 16 |
> > We know. Bug #43449 covers this. |
| 17 |
> > |
| 18 |
> > > So, I propose the maintainers of php*-cvs/re2c do one of:- |
| 19 |
> > > |
| 20 |
> > > 1) Pull from portage. Drastic, yes, but why have ebuilds in the |
| 21 |
> > > tree if the wont compile for most gentoo users? |
| 22 |
> > |
| 23 |
> > I believe that re2c is required for something or other to do with php5. |
| 24 |
> > Coredumb's really the best person to answer that, but he doesn't seem to |
| 25 |
> > be around much lately :( |
| 26 |
> > |
| 27 |
> > > 2) Fix them. I'll try as hard as I can (I've done most of the |
| 28 |
> > > porting of re2c (current ver in portage), I'm just left with a few C++ |
| 29 |
> > > idioms..) to fix it up so it's usable. |
| 30 |
> > |
| 31 |
> > Why duplicate work? Take a look at re2c.org ... there's already a |
| 32 |
> > project underway to deal with this, which includes important patches from |
| 33 |
> > the PHP developers. |
| 34 |
> > |
| 35 |
> > If you update bug #43449 with an ebuild for re2c.org's version, I'll |
| 36 |
> > happily take a look at it. |
| 37 |
> |
| 38 |
> OK, I've got a patch ready for bug #43449. This patch applies to |
| 39 |
> re2c.org's 0.9.1 (based on the patch already in portage 8) It's available |
| 40 |
> here (as I couldn't reach bugs.gentoo.org - crap isp ;) |
| 41 |
> |
| 42 |
> http://people.emcb.co.uk/beu/devo/gentoo/re2c/re2c-ebuild.patch |
| 43 |
> http://people.emcb.co.uk/beu/devo/gentoo/re2c/files/0.9.1-patch |
| 44 |
> |
| 45 |
> (Add a .gz to the last one for gzip'ed patch.) |
| 46 |
> |
| 47 |
> I know the Makefile kludge is bad! :) I'm going to try and work on a |
| 48 |
> solution upstream, but in the mean time re2c builds and works (haven't |
| 49 |
> tried with gcc2 yet - will do that today). |
| 50 |
> |
| 51 |
> The ebuild does a double `emake || die' because the first time re2c is |
| 52 |
> compiled is uses the pre-processed `scanner.cc' (bootstrap) the second is |
| 53 |
> done using the just-compiled re2c. Hrmm.. |
| 54 |
|
| 55 |
Replying to myself as I've had some sleep and have now come to the conclusion |
| 56 |
my patch is fit only for the bin. :) |
| 57 |
|
| 58 |
I'm going to get on the re2c mailing list and try and push most of this |
| 59 |
upstream (the bulk are general portability changes, not really gentoo |
| 60 |
specific). I'll comment on bug #43449 when I have something that isn't |
| 61 |
kludge. ;) |
| 62 |
|
| 63 |
Sorry for the noise 8) |
| 64 |
|
| 65 |
Elfyn |
| 66 |
|
| 67 |
- -- |
| 68 |
Elfyn McBratney, EMCB |
| 69 |
mailto:elfyn@×××××××.uk |
| 70 |
http://www.emcb.co.uk/ |
| 71 |
|
| 72 |
PGP Key ID: 0x456548B4 |
| 73 |
PGP Key Fingerprint: |
| 74 |
29D5 91BB 8748 7CC9 650F 31FE 6888 0C2A 4565 48B4 |
| 75 |
|
| 76 |
"When I say something, I put my name next to it." -- Isaac Jaffee |
| 77 |
|
| 78 |
>> ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ << |
| 79 |
<< ~ Linux london 2.6.5-emcb-241 #2 i686 GNU/Linux ~ >> |
| 80 |
>> ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ << |
| 81 |
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- |
| 82 |
Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (GNU/Linux) |
| 83 |
|
| 84 |
iD8DBQFAe7HzaIgMKkVlSLQRAtxCAKCCcBb6u6I0iaVh1HRc4ze7rD2jWwCgteHw |
| 85 |
Lia1RusvbcsWnH/LaDlqmpc= |
| 86 |
=kJkf |
| 87 |
-----END PGP SIGNATURE----- |
| 88 |
|
| 89 |
-- |
| 90 |
gentoo-dev@g.o mailing list |
Archives