1 |
On Mon, Jan 12, 2009 at 2:00 PM, Dale <rdalek1967@×××××.com> wrote: |
2 |
> Tomáš Chvátal wrote: |
3 |
>> Hi, |
4 |
>> << SNIP >> |
5 |
>> |
6 |
>> Tomas |
7 |
>> PS: I really hope i didnt miss something important. |
8 |
>> PPS: I really really hope that this time kmail will sent this as only text |
9 |
>> mail not html one. |
10 |
>> |
11 |
> |
12 |
> And in the future, hit compose new message instead. Your message appears |
13 |
> as part of a thread of the subject: "Automated Package Removal and |
14 |
> Addition Tracker, for the week ending 2009-01-11 23h59 UTC" That could |
15 |
> mean some won't see your post. I almost didn't myself. I was curious |
16 |
> since no one replies to that automated thing. Who would answer if they |
17 |
> did? :/ |
18 |
|
19 |
his original message contained: |
20 |
|
21 |
References: <E1LMASL-0002kk-Jh@××××××××××××.org> |
22 |
In-Reply-To: <E1LMASL-0002kk-Jh@××××××××××××.org> |
23 |
|
24 |
Which I assume confused a subset[1] of clients because that messageID |
25 |
is from Robin's automated message. |
26 |
|
27 |
I dunno why kmail would do such a thing if you claim to have written a |
28 |
new message though; maybe some testing is in order ;) |
29 |
|
30 |
-Alec |
31 |
|
32 |
[1] gmail apparently ignores said headers and figures out what is a |
33 |
'conversation' some other way. |
34 |
|
35 |
> |
36 |
> Dale |
37 |
> |
38 |
> :-) :-) |
39 |
> |
40 |
> |