| 1 |
Alle 13:50, sabato 24 dicembre 2005, Peter ha scritto: |
| 2 |
> Also, I find it absolutely fascinating that the only people against this |
| 3 |
> concept are devs, and the only people for it are users. Remember that |
| 4 |
> users are your customers. Every effort should be made to keep them happy. |
| 5 |
|
| 6 |
As a user, I wouldn't normally write to this list, but you asked for our |
| 7 |
opinions. |
| 8 |
|
| 9 |
Apart from the fact that I upgrade the kernel more often than I upgrade |
| 10 |
nvidia-kernel, and as many have pointed out this means reistallyng glx, |
| 11 |
nvidia-settings and nvidia-xconfig even if not needed, there's also another |
| 12 |
important point: |
| 13 |
|
| 14 |
This unified ebuild will lead me to upgrade the package even if it is just a |
| 15 |
rev-bump for issues related to (e.g.) nvidia-settings, which I don't even |
| 16 |
use!! Or do you expect that users always look at the Changelog to see if the |
| 17 |
upgrade really applies to them. How could this "improve the user's |
| 18 |
experience"? |
| 19 |
|
| 20 |
Some may not agree with the idea of turning it in a meta-ebuild, but if this |
| 21 |
must really be done, I think that would be the only way to keep everyone |
| 22 |
satisfied. |
| 23 |
|
| 24 |
-- |
| 25 |
Move -- Proudly abusing Gentoo Base System version 1.12.0_pre12 |
| 26 |
Linux 2.6.14-gentoo-r5 |
| 27 |
-- |
| 28 |
gentoo-dev@g.o mailing list |
Archives