| 1 |
On Friday 25 June 2004 07:44, Markus Nigbur wrote: |
| 2 |
> > also a good tool for the QA team would be something like a |
| 3 |
> > feedback-option in the portage script. i mean: if "emerge apache" fails a |
| 4 |
> > user should be able to report a feedback direktly via portage to the |
| 5 |
> > bugzilla or better the |
| 6 |
> > qa team. the qa-team then probably can do more checks and verify the |
| 7 |
> > failure. |
| 8 |
> |
| 9 |
> That's a frequent request, but the general opinion is - bugzilla serves |
| 10 |
> all needs. |
| 11 |
|
| 12 |
I like the idea of this tool, and the idea of reporting automatically into |
| 13 |
bugzilla. If we have bug voting (like bugs.kde.org), you could combine this |
| 14 |
to automatically produce interesting stats and reports about the problems |
| 15 |
that are actually occuring. |
| 16 |
|
| 17 |
Best regards, |
| 18 |
Stu |
| 19 |
-- |
| 20 |
Stuart Herbert stuart@g.o |
| 21 |
Gentoo Developer http://www.gentoo.org/ |
| 22 |
http://stu.gnqs.org/diary/ |
| 23 |
|
| 24 |
GnuPG key id# F9AFC57C available from http://pgp.mit.edu |
| 25 |
Key fingerprint = 31FB 50D4 1F88 E227 F319 C549 0C2F 80BA F9AF C57C |
| 26 |
-- |
Archives