| 1 |
On Fri, June 25, 2004 8:17, Christopher Korn said: |
| 2 |
> a read only access to the bugzilla database would be the best thing like |
| 3 |
> kurt said. the bugzilla-get method is really not the cleanest way and a |
| 4 |
> direct-databaseaccess via php or python is much cleaner and more |
| 5 |
> beautiful. |
| 6 |
|
| 7 |
Or a daily|hourly|whatever database dump you can fetch from the mirrors |
| 8 |
and work with. |
| 9 |
|
| 10 |
> also a good tool for the QA team would be something like a feedback-option |
| 11 |
> in the portage script. i mean: if "emerge apache" fails a user should be |
| 12 |
> able to report a feedback direktly via portage to the bugzilla or better |
| 13 |
> the |
| 14 |
> qa team. the qa-team then probably can do more checks and verify the |
| 15 |
> failure. |
| 16 |
|
| 17 |
That's a frequent request, but the general opinion is - bugzilla serves |
| 18 |
all needs. |
| 19 |
|
| 20 |
-- |
| 21 |
(o_ Markus Nigbur |
| 22 |
//\ Gentoo Linux Developer |
| 23 |
[ ]/_ http://www.gentoo.org |
| 24 |
|
| 25 |
|
| 26 |
-- |
| 27 |
gentoo-dev@g.o mailing list |
Archives