Gentoo Archives: gentoo-dev

From: Duncan <1i5t5.duncan@×××.net>
To: gentoo-dev@l.g.o
Subject: [gentoo-dev] Re: RFC: CONFIG_CHECK_FATAL, making CONFIG_CHECKS fatal by default
Date: Thu, 24 Jan 2013 17:49:36
Message-Id: pan.2013.01.24.17.49.05@cox.net
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-dev] RFC: CONFIG_CHECK_FATAL, making CONFIG_CHECKS fatal by default by Rich Freeman
1 Rich Freeman posted on Tue, 22 Jan 2013 06:56:08 -0500 as excerpted:
2
3
4 > I just got an elog out of udisks complaining about
5 > USB_SUSPEND not being set, and I have no idea why I'd need that on a
6 > system that is powered 24x7. Even the kernel docs suggest that it
7 > should be disabled if users aren't sure if they need it.
8
9 FWIW, that's for runtime power management. Even a wall-powered system
10 that's always running can shutdown unused USB devices when they're not
11 needed, saving power at the incremental level, anyway.
12
13 However, that is a rather newer feature, and may cause issues with USB
14 wakeup on obscure or older (say USB-1.x generation) hardware, thus the
15 kernel help recommendation for that option.
16
17 That said, presumably udisks would choose not to make its check fatal,
18 altho changing the default to fatal could complicate things for existing
19 ebuilds until they're fixed.
20
21 --
22 Duncan - List replies preferred. No HTML msgs.
23 "Every nonfree program has a lord, a master --
24 and if you use the program, he is your master." Richard Stallman

Replies