1 |
On Sun, Jul 14, 2013 at 1:29 PM, Diego Elio Pettenò |
2 |
<flameeyes@×××××××××.eu> wrote: |
3 |
> On 14/07/2013 18:26, Peter Stuge wrote: |
4 |
>> I don't think anyone can dispute that there exists a genre called |
5 |
>> adventure games.. |
6 |
> |
7 |
> How comes scummvm is not in the list then? Just saying. |
8 |
> |
9 |
> Seriously, a category for 10 games is *not* a good idea. There is at |
10 |
> least one (scummvm) who could fit there. Not sure if we have rainslick |
11 |
> still in tree but it would fit as well. |
12 |
|
13 |
Makes sense. |
14 |
|
15 |
If somebody wants to clean up the games categories I think a better |
16 |
place to start is to just list all the games and assign every one to a |
17 |
logical category, rather than just doing it piecemeal. Obviously we |
18 |
could give some weight to the status quo, but I think that dramatic |
19 |
change that at least makes sense would get us to a better place than |
20 |
just picking a dozen packages here and there and moving them. |
21 |
|
22 |
I have nothing against an adventure category - I guess I'm just more |
23 |
concerned with how we're populating it. One of the advantages of |
24 |
planning ahead is that for all we know just having one general |
25 |
adventure category might put too many packages in it. |
26 |
|
27 |
Rich |