| 1 |
> On Nov 17, 2014, at 7:03 PM, hasufell <hasufell@g.o> wrote: |
| 2 |
> |
| 3 |
>> On 11/18/2014 12:47 AM, Andreas K. Huettel wrote: |
| 4 |
>> Am Dienstag, 18. November 2014, 00:38:36 schrieb hasufell: |
| 5 |
>> |
| 6 |
>> We just don't want to answer a thousand |
| 7 |
>> questions when things break for others. That is the whole point of sane |
| 8 |
>> defaults. |
| 9 |
> |
| 10 |
> Except that sane defaults are not a substitute for correct dependencies |
| 11 |
> (like people omitting USE flag deps on libsdl, because they assume users |
| 12 |
> won't disable them). |
| 13 |
> |
| 14 |
> Also, you don't have to answer questions if it's clear that certain |
| 15 |
> settings break stuff and what they break. There are ways to communicate |
| 16 |
> this (even in USE flag descriptions). |
| 17 |
> If you don't communicate it, then you will have to answers questions... |
| 18 |
> |
| 19 |
|
| 20 |
Can we all agree that dependencies should be correct regardless of the use flag settings? And leave the rest of this discussion to the bikeshed it belongs in ? :) |
Archives