| 1 |
On 15 September 2014 11:21, Patrick Lauer <patrick@g.o> wrote: |
| 2 |
|
| 3 |
> iow, git doesn't allow people to work on more than one item at a time? |
| 4 |
> |
| 5 |
> That'd mean I need half a dozen checkouts just to emulate cvs, which |
| 6 |
> somehow |
| 7 |
> doesn't make much sense to me ... |
| 8 |
> |
| 9 |
|
| 10 |
Use the Stash. Or just commit items, then swap branches, and then discard |
| 11 |
the commits sometime later before pushing. |
| 12 |
|
| 13 |
Unlike CVS, git doesn't force you to work in "Keep millions of files in |
| 14 |
uncommitted states" mode just to work on a codebase, due to the commit <-> |
| 15 |
replicate seperation. |
| 16 |
|
| 17 |
|
| 18 |
-- |
| 19 |
Kent |
| 20 |
|
| 21 |
*KENTNL* - https://metacpan.org/author/KENTNL |
Archives